Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Home | About IJNM | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions | Ahead of Print | Online submissionLogin 
Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 1090 Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size

 Table of Contents     
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 36  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 120-124  

Establishing the [18F]-FDG production via two different automated synthesizers for routine clinical studies: Our institutional experiences of 4 years

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences; Department of Pharmacology, Integral University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Department of Pharmacology, Integral University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Submission23-Jul-2020
Date of Decision17-Aug-2020
Date of Acceptance05-Sep-2020
Date of Web Publication21-Jun-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Manish Dixit
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_137_20

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]-FDG) is the most widely used positron-emission tomography tracer used for imaging in clinical studies such as early detection of cancer or its malignancies, quantifications, staging, and restaging of several malignancies. For clinical application, routine production of this tracer is mandatory in compliance to regulatory guidelines. Several dedicated commercial synthesizers are currently used for producing[18F]-FDG for clinical usage. Being at hospital radiopharmacy, it is our responsibility and duty to support the clinical service with uninterrupted production and supply of [18F]-FDG. This document describes the production of [18F]-FDG using two different automated synthesizers in terms of its production yield, time of synthesis, and analyze the quality control (QC) of the produced [18F]-FDG. Materials and Methods: The precursor, mannose triflate ultra-pure, authentic nonradioactive standard FDG and [18O]-water were obtained from ABX, Germany. Solvents and reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich India Ltd. and Fisher Scientific India Ltd., (Mumbai, Maharashtra, India). Results: The protocol developed for the synthesis with MPS-100 synthesizer yield of [18F]-FDG is approximate about 45% End of Bombardment (EOB) with synthesis time of around 35 min, whereas with F300E synthesizer it is around 60% with synthesis time of 25 min. The quality of the tracer produced by both synthesizers is at par with the QC parameter for clinical applications. Conclusions: Finally, we have developed the production using two automated synthesis modules which have the capability to produce [18F]-FDG, to do the patient studies in good yield and purity. Our protocol is simple, reproducible, and robust.

Keywords: Automation, fluorodeoxyglucose, quality control, synthesizer

How to cite this article:
Saxena P, Singh AK, Dixit M, Kheruka SC, Mahmood T, Gambhir S. Establishing the [18F]-FDG production via two different automated synthesizers for routine clinical studies: Our institutional experiences of 4 years. Indian J Nucl Med 2021;36:120-4

How to cite this URL:
Saxena P, Singh AK, Dixit M, Kheruka SC, Mahmood T, Gambhir S. Establishing the [18F]-FDG production via two different automated synthesizers for routine clinical studies: Our institutional experiences of 4 years. Indian J Nucl Med [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 4];36:120-4. Available from:

   Introduction Top

2-[18F]-Fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (2 [18F] FDG) commonly called fluorodeoxyglucose also abbreviated as 18F FDG or FDG, is one of the most important and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved radiopharmaceutical used for the measurement of glucose metabolism using positron emission tomography (PET).[1a-c] It has been used in the diagnosis, staging, and restaging of several clinical conditions such as head and brain cancer, lung cancer, lymphoma, colorectal cancer, melanoma, and neck and breast cancer.[2]

Synthesis of 18F-FDG is well documented in the literature, but every radiopharmacy has its own challenges to achieve as the cost to be borne by the patients. At hospital pharmacy, the daily challenges to encounter for 18F-FDG production are: (i) need for rapid and reliable manufacturing of 18F-FDG, (ii) radiation safety due to the use of multicurie amount of 18F-produced through proton bombardment of enriched [18O]-H2O, (iii) followed current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) as recommended by regulatory bodies (FDA 21CFR212, EU), and (iv) cost-effective to be bear by patients.[3],[4]

Currently, the production of 18F-FDG is exclusively shifted to automated from earlier manual protocols, which compiles the clinical use of it as a generic drug in accordance with 21CFR212 (FDA).[4],[5],[6] Various commercial dedicated automated radiosynthesizers such as Tracsis 18F-FDG QUAD, GE TracerLab MX, GE FASTlab, Bioscan, Inc. “F18-Plus” and IBA Synthera, Sumitomo's F300, etc., are designed to produce 18F-FDG as per the GMP standards, and it complies the quality controls (QC) tests. These synthesizers are mostly cassette-based modules, run by software template, that are sterile, manufactured according to cGMP and are compatible with validated clinical procedures and used for producing large quantity of 18F-FDG. In addition, the transition to automated systems ensures safety to radiochemists while adhering to as low as reasonably achievable principle during producing excessive larger quantity of production as some center demands due to high patient studies.

With increasing demand for [18F]-FDG for human use, production methodologies require short synthesis times with high yield, followed by a fast QC. The first proposed synthesis was documented in 1976,[7] since then, various routes of production and improved yield were well documented.[8],[9],[10] Now, the widely used chemistry protocol is the nucleophilic substitution method, followed by an alkaline hydrolysis and subsequent solid phase extraction cartridge purification to afford the [18F]-FDG, this all requires about 30 min.[11] All the commercially available synthesis modules work on the above mentioned chemistry mechanism with variation in purification methodology. The purification methods are mostly designed to remove toxic chemical impurities which comprise [18F] fluoride, Fluorodeoxy mannose (FDM), partially or fully acetylated glucose molecule ([18F] ACY), Kryptofix 2.2.2, and/or acetonitrile (or other residual solvents).

We established the routine production of 18F-FDG as required by our hospital; for this purpose, we optimized the production and quality assurance of 18F-FDG using two automated synthesizers. We, at our center, have two different synthesizers, manufactures by Sumitomo Heavy Industries Limited, Japan, of which one is a fully dedicated synthetic module for 18F-FDG production named as F300E module and another one is a multipurpose synthesizer termed as MPS-100 with an option to designed chemistry template for 18F-chemistry as per user need. In this paper, we document our experience in synthesizing the 18F-FDG by two automated modules and comparing their results in terms of synthesis time, yield, user friendliness, and QC test of the final product.[12]

   Materials and Methods Top

The precursor, mannose triflate ultra-pure, authentic nonradioactive standard FDG and [18O]-water were obtained from ABX, Germany. Solvents and reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich India Ltd., and Fisher Scientific India Ltd., (Mumbai, Maharashtra, India). The chemicals were used without any further purification and were commercially available. The United States Pharmacopeia (USP)-grade 0.9% NaCl and sterile water for injection were purchased from B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany. SEP-PAK cartridges (light QMA cartridges, PS2 cartridges, and Alumina N plus cartridges) were achieved from Waters India Ltd. The Maxi-Clean IC-H cartridges were purchased from Grace Davison Discovery Science, USA. Before they were used, light QMA cartridges were conditioned with 10 ml of 80% ethanol (EtOH), followed by 10 ml of 0.1M K2CO3 solution, followed by 60 ml of water (H2O), PS2, Alumina N plus, and IC-H cartridges were preconditioned with 10 ml of 80% ethanol (EtOH), followed by 40 ml of H2O. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis was performed using an Agilent 1260 HPLC system equipped with a Refractive Index detector (Model 35900E, Agilent, USA) and a radiation detector connected in series. Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18 analytic column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 μm) was eluted with at flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. Radio-thin layer chromatography was carried out using aluminum sheets precoated with silica gel 60 F254 (E. Merck, Germany) (the volume ratio of CH3CN to H2O equals 95:5) chromatograms of [18F] FDG samples. The apyrogenicity was done using the Charles River EndoSafe Portable Testing System instrument which works on the kinetic chromogenic limulus amebocyte lysate method as specified in the EP/USP.

   Results Top

The different quality tests performed for each batch of 18F-FDG produced through both the machines were summarized [Table 1]. All the parameters of the different quality tests comply the standard set by the various regulatory agencies for clinical usage. Both synthesizers produced the final product in more than 95% radiochemical purity. The program template designed for MPS-100 also complies the test parameter set for the QC data to product required yield and purity of the final product.
Table 1: Quality Control Parameters

Click here to view

With the installation of the cyclotron facility as well radiochemistry facility in the year 2015, we served thousands of patients every year with [18F]-FDG based PET studies and these production protocols help us to serve the patients uninterrupted. So far, we performed more than 5000 PET scans and more than 700 syntheses using both the synthesizer. The number of PET scans as well as the number of successful synthesis runs self explain the robustness and reliability of the machine as well as chemistry protocol.

   Discussion Top

Automated synthesis of 18F-FDG using F300 synthesis module

The synthesis of 18F-FDG was performed in this dedicated synthesizer. The system was configured with locked synthesis software template, our first priority to establish the synthesis of 18F-FDG and access its quality for clinical application. We performed the optimization runs using the chemistry protocol as designed by the manufacturer. The synthesis starts with pre-checking of the system internal parameters as such as temperature of reactor, pressure, flow of dry Nitrogen and air, on off of respective valve for flow and leak detection. As the system QC passed, it is ready for the 18F-FDG synthesis. The system received the required no carrier-added [18F]-fluoride in [18O] H2O from an 18O (p, n) 18F reaction through in-house cyclotron (Sumitomo's HM-18) connected through internal delivery line. [18F] fluoride delivered from a cyclotron was trapped on a preconditioned QMA cartridge and was eluted with K2CO3: Kryptofix 2.2.2 solution (0.2 ml in H2O: 0.7 ml in dry acetonitrile, phase transfer catalyst), marked as yellow neck vial K2CO3/K2.2.2 [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Software template screenshot and image of the automated synthesis of [18F]-FDG in F300E synthesizer

Click here to view

The solution was azeotropically dried by stream of dry nitrogen and negative pressure to form dried KF18 at 100°C for 8 min by adding dry acetonitrile (0.2 ml); the fluorination was done by adding mannose triflate (20 mg in 1.8 ml of dry acetonitrile) to this dried reaction mixture. The nucleophilic substitution reaction was performed for 6 min at 100°C by replacing triflate ions by fluoride ion to produce acetylated fluorinated glucose (2-fluoro-1, 3, 4, 6-tetra-O-acetyl-D-glucose). The system performed the one more drying cycle at 90°C for 5 min, in order to remove the volatile impurities, especially acetonitrile. The base-mediated hydrolysis was performed at 100°C for 5 min using 0.3M solution of NaOH. The reaction mixture was cooled down and loaded on purifying cartridges assembly. The preconditioned cartridges are used to remove the impurities such as to trap Kryptofix 2.2.2., 18F, 1, 3, 4, 6-tetra-O-acetyl-2-O-trifluoromethanesulfonyl-β-D-mannopyranose (TATM), and fluorinated TATM, and the activity was transferred to the product vial. Finally, the product was eluted with 5 ml of the sterile water which passes through the reaction vial to refining columns, in order to wash out any activity left to reaction vial, into the sterile product vial having a 0.22 μM sterile membrane filter. The total synthesis takes about 26 min and yield is about 65%. The [18F]-FDG solution is clear, colorless, neutral, and isotonic. It is subjected to pass the quality tests before being used for clinical studies. After successfully performing ten hot runs and comparing their QC data, we moved for support the clinical studies [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Quality test of the [18F] FDG synthesized via the automated synthesizer

Click here to view

Automated synthesis of 18F-FDG using MPS-100 multipurpose synthesis module

After successful optimization of the production of 18F-FDG through the F300 module, we move forward to work with the multipurpose synthesis module. This module has capabilities to perform the 11C, 13N, 15O, and18F chemistries as desired by the user. The module has open software operation with programming capabilities to modify it as per chemistry. For doing 18F-chemistry, it has individually operated five vial valves and one closed reactor. These valves and reactor can be programmed as per need and operated with a designed software template. After completion of the reaction, the crude can be either loaded to appropriate solid Sep-Pak cartridge system for purification or loaded into an integrated semi-preparative HPLC system for purification; the purified product will be transferred to a housed rotatory vacuum evaporator to reduce the HPLC solvent. The final purified product will then diluted to physiological solution to finally transfer through a sterile filter for clinical studies after performing the quality assurance tests.

In brief, the bombarded [18O]-H2O was transfer to the collection vial cyclotron line and then valve V66, V10, V11, and V75 open to trap the 18F ions to preconditioned QMA cartridge, and remnant [18O]-H2O was collected to vial marked as 18O-water. The trapped activity was eluted with mixture of K2CO3 and K2.2.2 (0.2 ml/0.7 ml) and transferred to the reaction vessel through the opening of valve V11, V12, V13, and V14. The azeotropically drying of the reaction mixture was performed at 100°C for 8 min, followed by the second cycle of drying through the addition of acetonitrile (0.2 ml) via opening of valve V74 for 5 min at 90°C. After cooling down the reactor, the precursor mannose triflate was added via the opening of valve V73. The fluorination was performed at 100°C for 10 min, followed by drying of excess of acetonitrile [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Software template screenshot for MPS-100 18F-FDG synthesis scheme

Click here to view

The hydrolysis accomplished at 100°C for 3 min, by the addition of 0.3M NaOH to the reaction vessel. The reactor was cooled down and crude was loaded to set of purification cartridges. To accomplish the complete transfer of crude mixture, the reaction vessel was washed with 5 ml of water of injection, and this water is passed through the purification cartridge; the order of IC-H, PS2, and Alumina N from the upstream are connected to each other to trap Kryptofix222, K+, Na+, CO32-, free fluoride ions, fluorinated TATM, and TATM, to elute out the purified [18F]-FDG, whereas all the impurities were trapped within these cartridges. The final18F-FDG was collected in sterile product vial through sterile filter and is ready for QC and clinical studies. The total synthesis time was about 35 min and yield is approximately 45% [Figure 4].
Figure 4: High-performance liquid chromatography and radioactive thin layer chromatography scan of the [18F]-FDG product

Click here to view

   Conclusions Top

We developed two different protocols over these machines in order to serve the patients who are coming to our PET center for their studies. The development of the 18F-FDG synthesis software template over the MPS-100 synthesizer facilitates our center to serve the patients when our fully dedicated synthesizer failed the production. The failure of a dedicated synthesizer may account either to some technical issues or QC test failure. The protocol developed with MPS 100 synthesizer for production of [18F] FDG, yielded approximate 45% (EOB), with synthesis time of around 35 min. Finally, our centers have two automated synthesis modules which have the capability to produce [18F]-FDG in good yield and purity, to do the patient studies. Our protocol is simple, reproducible, and robust to work over it.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

   References Top

(a) Glaudemans AW, Signore A. FDG-PET/CT in infections: The imaging method of choice? Eur J Nuc Med Mol Imag 2010;37:1986-91. (b) Gafter-Gvili A, Raibman S, Grossman A, Avni T, Paul M, Leibovici L, <Italic>et al</Italic>. QJM. 2015;108:289-98. (c) Som P, Atkins HL, Bandoypadhyay D, Fowler JS, MacGregor RR, Matsui K, <Italic>et al</Italic>,. A fluorinated glucose analog, 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (F-18): nontoxic tracer for rapid tumor detection. J Nucl Med. 1980;21:670-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
Richards ML, Scott PJH. Synthesis of [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG). In: Scott PJ, Hockley BG, Editors. Radiochemical Syntheses. Vol No. 1. Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron Emission Tomography, Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.,; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 2
Schwarz SW, Dick D, VanBrocklin HF, Hoffman JM. Regulatory Requirements for PET Drug Production. J Nucl Med 2014;55:1132-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
Yu S. Review of 18F-FDG synthesis and quality control. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2006;2:E57.  Back to cited text no. 4
United state Department of Health and Human services. Food and Drug Administration, Centre for Drug Evaluation and research (CDER), 2009. Guidance: PET Drugs-Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP): Draft Guidance. Available from: htpp://, Information/Guidance/UCMO070306.pdf Jan. 18, 2012.  Back to cited text no. 5
Fowler JS, Ido T. Initial and subsequent approach for the synthesis of 18FDG. Semin Nucl Med 2002;32:6-12.  Back to cited text no. 6
Ehrenkaufer RE, Potocki JF, Jewett DM. Simple synthesis of F-18- labelled 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: Concise communication. J Nucl Med. 1984; 25: 333-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
Levy S, Elmaleh DR, Livni E. A new method using anhydrous [18F]fluoride to radiolabel 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. J Nucl Med 1982;23:918-22.  Back to cited text no. 8
Hamacher K, Coenen HH, Stöcklin G. Efficient stereospecific synthesis of no-carrier-added 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose using aminopolyether supported nucleophilic substitution. J Nucl Med 1986;27:235-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
Lemaire C, Damhaut PH, Lauricella B, Fast [18F]FDG synthesis by alkaline hydrolysis on a low polarity solid phase support. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm 2002;45:435-47.  Back to cited text no. 10
Guidelines on the Current Good Radiopharmacy Practice (cGRPP) In the Preparation of Radiopharmaceuticals, cGRPP-Guideline, Version 2 March 2007.  Back to cited text no. 11
Gafter-Gvili A, Raibman S, Grossman A, Avni T, Paul M, Leibovici L, <Italic>et al</Italic>. [18F]FDG-PET/CT for the diagnosis of patients with fever of unknown origin. QJM 2015;108:289-98.  Back to cited text no. 12


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]

  [Table 1]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
    Materials and Me...
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded111    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal