Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Home | About IJNM | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions | Ahead of Print | Online submissionLogin 
Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 898 Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
 Table of Contents     
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 36  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 105-106  

Epidemiological data of lymphedema in lymphoscintigraphy of the lower extremities


1 Department Radiology in Medicine School of Sao Jose do Rio Preto, FAMERP, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil
2 Department Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery in Medicine School of Sao Jose do Rio Preto-FAMERP-Brazil and Research National Council for Research and Development-CNPq, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil
3 Clinica Godoy in Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil

Date of Submission04-Jan-2020
Date of Decision30-Jan-2020
Date of Acceptance06-Mar-2020
Date of Web Publication04-Mar-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Jose Maria Pereira de Godoy
Floriano Peixoto 2950, São Jose do Rio Preto, SP, CEP: 15020-010
Brazil
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_2_20

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Santana KR, de Godoy JM, Guerreiro Godoy Md. Epidemiological data of lymphedema in lymphoscintigraphy of the lower extremities. Indian J Nucl Med 2021;36:105-6

How to cite this URL:
Santana KR, de Godoy JM, Guerreiro Godoy Md. Epidemiological data of lymphedema in lymphoscintigraphy of the lower extremities. Indian J Nucl Med [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 22];36:105-6. Available from: https://www.ijnm.in/text.asp?2021/36/1/105/310794



Lymphedema is a clinical condition in which an accumulation of macromolecules and fluids occurs in the interstitial space. Lymphoscintigraphy is the most specific examination in the diagnosis of lymphedema as it provides functional and anatomical information of the lymphatic system. In addition to the functional lymphatic features used to confirm clinical suspicion, possible sites of lymphatic malformations and neoplasias are also identified.[1],[2] The objective of this study was to correlate findings on images obtained in a scintigraphy chamber using a specific lymphoscintigraphy protocol for lymphedema with epidemiological data of patients treated in a teaching hospital.

The diagnostic results of lymphoscintigraphy of patients with leg lymphedema between 2006 and 2016 were correlated with epidemiological data including gender, age, schooling, affected limb dominance, and socioeconomic level in a cross-sectional epidemiological study. Data were reported using descriptive statistics and frequency of events. Fisher's exact test was used for the statistical analysis, with an alpha error of 5% (P < 0.05) being considered statistically significant.

A total of 430 patients were analyzed, 320 (74.42%) of which were female and 110 (25.58%) were male. The lymphoscintigraphy results were positive in 199 (46.27%) cases and negative in 231 (53.73%). Most (n = 183%–91.95%) of the 199 test results found positive for lymphedema were of female patients (P < 0.001).

The age of the patients ranged from 10 to 90 years (mean: 48 years). Predominantly, the patients were female (P < 0.001), with little schooling (P < 0.0001), [Figure 1], and low wages (P < 0.0001), [Figure 2]. Lymphedema occurred significantly more (P < 0.01) of the left (43.71%) than the right leg (32.66%) or bilaterally (23.63%). Lymphoscintigraphy allows the identification of changes in the anatomy of vessels and lymph nodes; however, it does not always define the diagnosis.
Figure 1: Frequency of positive and negative lymphoscintigraphy results stratified by schooling

Click here to view
Figure 2: Frequency of positive and negative lymphoscintigraphy results stratified by income

Click here to view


In the present study, the association of clinical data with lymphoscintigraphy provided a more precise definition. As lymphedema is characterized as a clinical manifestation that may be absent in the contralateral limb, the lymphatic alterations that are detected by lymphoscintigraphy in this limb should not be ignored. Thus, lymphoscintigraphy provides a more accurate diagnosis of the contralateral limb. This situation demonstrates the need to categorize alterations found in the limb not affected by the disease as a disorder of the lymphatic system and not as lymphedema.

These data reinforce the importance of lymphoscintigraphy as a diagnostic method to identify this clinical condition early and during the clinical management of patients. It is a safe and fast method with low radiation and presents few complications. It offers reliable images of the lymphatic system including the lymph nodes, and the examination can be easily repeated as necessary. In relation to the complementary examinations, volumetry by water plethysmography, the gold standard with a precision of between 0.7% and 1.3%, measurement of the limbs circumference and bioimpedance are another simple, inexpensive method of measures.[3]

Lymphedema is a public health problem that mostly affects women and individuals with lower socioeconomic and cultural conditions and little schooling. Although just one leg is more commonly affected, the occurrence of bilateral lymphedema is frequent. Lymphoscintigraphy is useful in defining the diagnosis in cases of doubt.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
de Godoy JM, Santana KR, Godoy Mde F. Lymphoscintigraphic evaluation of manual lymphatic therapy: The Godoy and Godoy technique. Phlebology 2015;30:39-44.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Pereira de Godoy JM, Pereira de Godoy HJ, Pereira de Godoy AC, Graciano de Marqui T, Guerreiro Godoy MF. Lymphedema and the mobilization of intracellular and extracellular fluids with intensive treatment. Acta Phlebol 2019;20:57-60.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Chromy A, Zalud L, Dobsak P, Suskevic I, Mrkvicova V. Limb volume measurements: Comparison of accuracy and decisive parameters of the most used present methods. Springerplus 2015;4:707.  Back to cited text no. 3
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed84    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded24    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal