|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 150-152
Extensive visceral calcification demonstrated on 99mTc-MDP bone scan in patient with carcinoma penis and hypercalcemia of malignancy
Sunny J Gandhi1, Bhavdeep Rabadiya2
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Pet Ct, Infocus Diagnostics, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
2 Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Infocus Diagnostics, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
|Date of Web Publication||16-Mar-2017|
Dr. Sunny J Gandhi
Infocus Diagnostics, Swastik Society, Opp. Vipul Dudhiya, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Hypercalcemia is a common life-threatening complication associated with several malignancies. Parathyroid-related peptide has been shown to cause hypercalcemia in several solid tumors but rarely in penile cancer. We report a case of penile cancer with hypercalcemia causing metastatic visceral calcification in lungs, liver, and stomach detected on bone scan without significant abnormalities on CT scan.
Keywords: Bone scan, carcinoma penis, hypercalcemia of malignancy, metastatic visceral calcification
|How to cite this article:|
Gandhi SJ, Rabadiya B. Extensive visceral calcification demonstrated on 99mTc-MDP bone scan in patient with carcinoma penis and hypercalcemia of malignancy. Indian J Nucl Med 2017;32:150-2
|How to cite this URL:|
Gandhi SJ, Rabadiya B. Extensive visceral calcification demonstrated on 99mTc-MDP bone scan in patient with carcinoma penis and hypercalcemia of malignancy. Indian J Nucl Med [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 May 10];32:150-2. Available from: https://www.ijnm.in/text.asp?2017/32/2/150/202251
A male patient of 34 years is a known case of squamous cell carcinoma penis. He initially presented with ulcero-proliferative growth in penile region, which was proved to be squamous cell carcinoma on biopsy. He underwent penectomy and bilateral inguinal lymph node dissection for the same. He presented with right inguinal lymph nodal recurrence 4 months later. He underwent chemotherapy followed by radiation to right inguinal region. On follow up, he developed severe hypercalcemia. His S. Calcium level was 18 mg/dl (normal range 8.60-10.20 mg/dl). S. Creatinine was 3.79 mg/dl (normal range 0.5-1.5 mg/dl) suggestive of severe renal impairment. He was also having back and chest pain and was referred for bone scan. 20 mCi of Tc 99m MDP (Methylene Diphosphonate) was injected IV and after 3 hour whole body swipe images were acquired in anterior and posterior projections on a dual head gamma camera. His whole body bone scan revealed significantly increased diffuse MDP uptake in bilateral lung fields, liver, and stomach. Scan was negative for skeletal metastasis [Figure 1]. Theses findings were suggestive of severe visceral calcification. Correlative CT scan images of thorax and upper abdomen did not show significant abnormality in lungs, liver, or stomach except for minimal bi-basal sub-pleural fibrosis [Figure 2a]-[Figure 2b]. He underwent MRI scanning of abdomen and pelvis to look for any recurrent malignant disease, as CT scan with contrast was not possible because of severe renal dysfunction. His MRI showed multiple heterogeneous enlarged right inguinal, right internal-external iliac, bilateral common iliac, pre-paraaortic, aorto-caval, and retrocaval lymph nodal metastasis.
|Figure 1: Whole body 99mTc-MDP bone scan shows diffuse increased tracer uptake in bilateral lung fields, liver, and in stomach. No evidence of any osteoblastic skeletal lesions|
Click here to view
|Figure 2a: Plain CT scan of thorax and upper abdomen shows no significant abnormality in lungs, liver, or stomach except mild bi-basal sub-pleural fibrosis|
Click here to view
|Figure 2b: CT scan of upper abdomen shows no significant abnormality in liver or stomach.|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Metastatic calcification was first described by Virchow in 1855. Metastatic calcification is deposition of calcium salts in otherwise normal tissue, because of elevated serum levels of calcium. Causes of metastatic calcification include hyperparathyroidism, chronic renal disease, sarcoidosis, amyloidosis, myeloma, malignant hypercalcemia of lymphomas, and solid tumors.,,,,,,,,, The exact mechanism of these calcium depositions remains uncertain; however, most accepted mechanism is an increase in the production of ionized calcium (calcium-phosphate complex primarily). The precipitation of ionized calcium is mainly in the alkaline pH tissues: lung, kidneys, myocardium, liver, and stomach walls.,,,,, Reason for hypercalcemia in malignancy is the release of parathyroid-related peptide by malignant tissues.
Hypercalcemia is a common life-threatening complication associated with several genitourinary malignancies. Parathyroid-related peptide has been shown to cause hypercalcemia in several solid tumors but rarely in penile cancer. Only few cases have been reported.,, Our patient is a case of penile cancer with hypercalcemia causing metastatic visceral calcification detected on bone scan.
Bone scanning is sensitive modality for the detection of metastatic calcification.,, It is more sensitive and can pick up micro-calcification, not detected by conventional imaging modalities. Our case did not show any significant calcification in lungs, liver, or stomach on CT scan. In most cases, these metastatic calcifications are reversible after normalization of calcium metabolism and renal function with disappearance of the increased uptake on bone scan.,,, Unfortunately, we do not have any follow up bone scan of the patient.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest
| References|| |
Wheat D, McCarthy P. Metastatic pulmonary, gastric and renal calcification on bone scintigraphy demontrated in a patient with malignant melanoma and renal failure. Clin Nucl Med 1998;23:824-7.
Low RD Hicks RJ, Arkles LB, Gill G, Adam W. Progressive soft tissue uptake of the Tc-99m MDP Reflecting metastatic microcalcifications. Clin Nucl Med 1992;17:658-62.
Eagel BA, Stier ST, Waken C. Non-osseous bone scan abnormalities in multiple myeloma associated with hypercalcemia. Clin Nucl Med 1988;14:869-73.
Reitz MD. Myocardial, pulmonary and gastric uptake of Tc-99 m MDP in a patient with mulitple myeloma and hypercalcemia. Clin Nucl Med 1986;11:730.
Coolens J, Devos P, De Roo M. Diffuse pulmonary uptake of Tc-99m bone imaging agents: Case report and survey. Eur J Nucl Med 1985;11:36.
Meyer MA, Mc Claughry P. Reversible Tc-99m diphosphonate uptake in gastric tissue related hypercalcemia associated with malignancy: A comparative study using FDG PET whole body imaging. Clin Nucl Med 1995;20:767-9.
Kempter H, Hagner G, Savaser AN, Huben H, Minguillon C. Metastatic pulmonary calcification in a patient with multiple myeloma nonsecretory. Respiration 1986;49:77-80.
Usmani S, Khan HA, Abu Huda F, Al Nafisi N, Al Mohannadi S. Extensive visceral calcification demonstrated on Tc-99m MDP bone scan in patient with sphenoidal sinus carcinoma and hypercalcaemia of malignancy: A bad prognostic sign. Gulf J Oncol 2011;9:61-4.
Erdogan S, Barutca S, Yurekli Y, Meydan N, Koseoglu K. Reversible metastatic visceral calcification detected by 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate bone scanning in breast cancer. J Bone Miner Metab 2005;23:407-9.
Marwah A, Kumar R, Dasan J B, Choudhury S, Bandopadhyaya G, Malhotra A. Soft tissue uptake of Tc99m-MDP in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clin Imag 2002;26:206-8.
Akashi T, Fuse H, Muraishi Y, Mizuno I, Nagakawa O, Furuya Y, Parathyroid hormone related protein producing penile cancer. J Urol 2002;167:249.
Gleen JF. Hypercalcemia and urologic malignancies. Urology 1995;41:139-41.
Malakoff AF, Schmidt JD. Metastatic carcinoma of penis complicated by hypercalcemia. J Urol 1975;5:510-3.
Choy D, Murray IP. Metastatic visceral calcification identified by bone scanning. Skeletal Radiol 1980;5:151-9.
Venkatesh N, Polcyn RE, Norback DH. Metastatic calcification: The role of bone scanning. Radiology 1978 Dec;129:755-8.
Imanishi Y, Kishiro M, Miyazaki O, Toyokawa T, Kuroki K, Haji H, et al
. Multiple metastatic calcifications detected by bone scintigraphy and demonstrated by CT. Clin Nucl Med 1992;17:114-8.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2a], [Figure 2b]