Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine

PICTORIAL ESSAY
Year
: 2016  |  Volume : 31  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 274--279

Common patterns of perineural spread in head-neck squamous cell carcinoma identified on fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography


Piyush Chandra, Nilendu Purandare, Sneha Shah, Archi Agrawal, Venkatesh Rangarajan 
 Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Venkatesh Rangarajan
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai - 400 012, Maharashtra
India

Abstract

Perineural spread in HNSCC is associated with dismal prognosis and decreased overall survival. Clinical diagnosis of this relatively asymptomatic entity is usually delayed and made incidentally on imaging. MRI is gold standard imaging for early diagnosing of this condition owing to its excellent anatomic resolution. With the ever increasing use of PET/CT in commonly encountered cancer such as HNSCC for staging and re-staging, observing perineural spread on PET/CT is not infrequent. Through this pictorial essay we demonstrate the common patterns of perineural spread in HNSCC on PET/CT with the aim of improving reporting accuracy across readers.



How to cite this article:
Chandra P, Purandare N, Shah S, Agrawal A, Rangarajan V. Common patterns of perineural spread in head-neck squamous cell carcinoma identified on fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.Indian J Nucl Med 2016;31:274-279


How to cite this URL:
Chandra P, Purandare N, Shah S, Agrawal A, Rangarajan V. Common patterns of perineural spread in head-neck squamous cell carcinoma identified on fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Indian J Nucl Med [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Dec 12 ];31:274-279
Available from: http://www.ijnm.in/text.asp?2016/31/4/274/190798


Full Text



 Introduction



Malignancies of the head/neck (HN), especially the squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) cancers arising in the oral cavity, are common in India and constitute a major public health problem. Most common ways of the spread for carcinomas in HN is by lymphatic route and in few cases hematogenous. Some tumors however have a propensity to spread to a distant site through perineural route. The exact reason for this phenomenon is presently unclear; probably the nerve appears to form a natural channel and conduit of least resistance along the otherwise “difficult-to-traverse” complex HN anatomy.

Perineural spread (PNS) in HN malignancies implies a grave prognosis with poor event-free and overall survival in patients with SCC compared to those without it.[1],[2],[3] PNS is more often a radiological diagnosis as many patients are clinically asymptomatic. This important prognostic finding, however, is frequently under-reported with most patients identified on retrospective review of radiographic images than on the initial scans.[4] With increasing use of 2-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (PET/CECT) in the evaluation of HN malignancy for staging, re-staging, and response evaluation, the observation of PNS being noticed early on PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) is not uncommon. The aim of this pictorial assay is to increase awareness of this entity by demonstrating the various patterns of PNS in HN cancers seen on PET/CT.

 Clinical Presentation



Increased risk of PNS in HN cancers is seen in males, increasing tumor size, mid-face location, recurrent disease setting, and poorly differentiated tumors.[5] The clinical diagnosis of PNS is often challenging (delayed/missed) as majority of the patients may be clinically asymptomatic for the same. The role of imaging, hence, in this condition is crucial. Imaging will help identify subsets of patients who would need alterations in surgical plan and/or adjuvant therapies (chemotherapy/radiation). The common histological subtypes associated with PNS (in decreasing order of frequency) are SCCs, adenoid cystic carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, skin cancers, and lymphoma.

Pathological anatomy of perineural spread

Commonly involved cranial nerves in PNS are mandibular division of trigeminal nerve (V3), maxillary nerve (V2), facial nerve (VII), and hypoglossal nerve (XII) due to their long extensive course in the HN region. The anatomical knowledge of the course of these nerves is essential in the clinicoradiological diagnosis of PNI [Table 1].[6] V2 nerve is usually involved by direct invasion though tumors in the upper lip or malar surface and tumors of nasopharynx or palate though the palatine nerves [Figure 1]. V3 nerve is usually involved by the tumors in the lower lip/alveolus spreading through inferior alveolar nerve, or parotid/infratemporal fossa tumors spreading via the auriculotemporal branch [Figure 2],[Figure 3],[Figure 4],[Figure 5],[Figure 6] PNS along facial (VII) nerve is usually involved by tumors of parotid glands, extending into the stylomastoid foramen and temporal bone. PNS along hypoglossal nerve (XII) involvement is seen with tumors of the tongue base and nasopharyngeal tumors [Figure 7] and [Figure 8]. Due to close proximity of the branches of these nerves, simultaneous multiple cranial nerve involvement in is not uncommon [Figure 5].{Table 1}{Figure 1}{Figure 2}{Figure 3}{Figure 4}{Figure 5}{Figure 6}{Figure 7}{Figure 8}

Magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of perineural spread

PNS is best and earliest detected with a contrast-enhanced T1-fat suppressed magnetic resonance (MR) sequences. Due to break in the blood-nerve barrier caused by the tumor, the enhancement of the nerve precedes the nerve enlargement. Further proliferation of the tumor leads to the replacement of the perineural fat and widening/erosion of foramen in skull bases. The nerve invasion by tumor may be seen as a continuous nerve enhancement or skip lesion at a distant site in nerve probably through perineural lymphatics. Indirect features of nerve involvement like muscle denervation seen as hyperintense T2 signals in the muscle secondary to edema can supplement the MR diagnosis of PNS [Figure 8].[7]

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography for diagnosis of perineural spread

The use of PET/CT in HNSCC is increasing. Superior diagnostic accuracy PET/CT over conventional morphological imaging has been established, especially for evaluating nodal and distant metastasis, to assess disease recurrence, assessing response to curative chemoradiotherapy or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and predicting treatment outcomes.[8] Detection of PNS of tumor on PET/CECT is not uncommon. The accuracy of PNS detection on PET/CT is lower than MR, owing to lower anatomical resolution, image artifacts, and higher incidence of false positive/false negative interpretations. It can, however, compliment MR in diagnosis of PNS or may be useful where MR is contra-indicated such as claustrophobia and renal insufficiency. Certain clues to image interpretation may help increase the reporting accuracy of PET/CECT for diagnosis of PNS in HNSCC [Table 2]. On PET/CT image, one should look for asymmetric increased linear/curvilinear FDG uptake in the region of nerve course (infratemporal fossa, pterygopalatine fossa, or nerve foramen) which may be contiguous or discontiguous with the primary/recurrent tumor [Figure 1],[Figure 2],[Figure 3],[Figure 4]. It is important to assess maximum intensity projection and all the three planes of the PET images. On CT images, one must look for any enhancement along the nerve course, loss of fat planes with soft tissues adjacent to the nerves, and widening/erosion of neural foramina [Figure 1] and [Figure 3]. Use of diagnostic quality CT, i.e., contrast-enhanced, high mA with thin bone window CT sections in the PET/CT protocol is of prime importance in diagnosing PNS in HNSCC.[9] CT reconstruction parameters used at our institute for HN region includes slice thickness of 0.67 mm, field of view of 250 mm, window - 35 × 350, increment - 0.33 mm, and matrix of 512. About 80 ml of low osmolar nonionic intravenous contrast is administered in all patients at a rate of 1.8 ml/s and scan delay is usually about 50–60 s.{Table 2}

Care should be taken to avoid frequent false negative/false positive interpretations on PET/CECT in HNSCC cases. The uptake intensity along the nerve course may be subtle leading to false negative scan, probably attributed to tumor biology (less uptake in salivary gland and necrotic neoplasm), improper PET/CT image co-registration, partial volume effect for smaller lesions (<1 cm), or high adjacent background activity in brain [Figure 6]. False positive scans can be seen in setting such as postradiotherapy/postoperative inflammation, asymmetric physiological FDG uptake in the facial muscles, hyper-enhancing primary neural tumors (schwannoma/meningiomas) [Figure 9], invasive fungal infections, and dental abscesses. Careful assessment of the patients' history, clinical features, and assessment of correlative imaging can help avoid such pitfalls.[10],[11],[12],[13]{Figure 9}

Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance for detection of perineural spread

Feasibility of clinical PET/MR for imaging HN tumors has been suggested by few studies.[14],[15] In addition to providing significantly less radiation exposure to the patient, this modality appears to have a higher spatial resolution, due to reduced partial volume effects and lesser chance of signal loss that is seen with small structures in HN.[14] This will translate into higher target to background contrast, further enhancing detection of PNS in HN SCC compared to that provided by the existing PET/CT systems.

 Conclusion



PNS in HN malignancies is uncommon but a dreadful event. Clinical presentation is usually delayed due to lack of symptoms and diagnosis is very often confirmed on imaging. MR imaging is the gold standard for identification of PNS and outperforms the diagnostic accuracy of CECT or PET/CT for this indication. With recent exponential increase in the use of PET/CT in HNSCC, identifying clinically occult PNS on PET/CT is not uncommon, thereby complementing MR in diagnosis and potentially obviating further diagnostic interventions. A precise knowledge of clinical presentation, regional anatomy, and correlative imaging is, however, a prerequisite and which may help the nuclear medicine physician in avoiding image misinterpretations. This would improve the reporting accuracy of PET/CT and along with recent advances in technology such as PET/MR would together promote molecular imaging toward being a “standard of care” in diagnostic evaluation of HN malignancies.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks JA, Berger DH, Albo D. Perineural invasion in cancer: A review of the literature. Cancer 2009;115:3379-91.
2Meng FY, Ko JY, Lou PJ, Wang CP, Yang TL, Chang CH, et al. The determining risk factors for treatment outcomes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the hard palate. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:2003-10.
3Majoie CB, Hulsmans FJ, Verbeeten B Jr., Castelyns JA, Oldenburger F, Schouwenburg PF, et al. Perineural tumor extension along the trigeminal nerve: Magnetic resonance imaging findings. Eur J Radiol 1997;24:191-205.
4Lee KJ, Abemayor E, Sayre J, Bhuta S, Kirsch C. Determination of perineural invasion preoperatively on radiographic images. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;139:275-80.
5Balamucki CJ, Mancuso AA, Amdur RJ, Kirwan JM, Morris CG, Flowers FP, et al. Skin carcinoma of the head and neck with perineural invasion. Am J Otolaryngol 2012;33:447-54.
6Sinnatamby, Chummy S, R. J Last. Last's Anatomy. 12th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2011.
7Ong CK, Chong VF. Imaging of perineural spread in head and neck tumours. Cancer Imaging 2010;10:S92-8.
8Evangelista L, Cervino AR, Chondrogiannis S, Marzola MC, Maffione AM, Colletti PM, et al. Comparison between anatomical cross-sectional imaging and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the staging, restaging, treatment response, and long-term surveillance of squamous cell head and neck cancer: A systematic literature overview. Nucl Med Commun 2014;35:123-34.
9Paes FM, Singer AD, Checkver AN, Palmquist RA, De La Vega G, Sidani C. Perineural spread in head and neck malignancies: Clinical significance and evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT. Radiographics 2013;33:1717-36.
10Blodgett TM, Fukui MB, Snyderman CH, Branstetter BF 4th, McCook BM, Townsend DW, et al. Combined PET-CT in the head and neck: Part 1. Physiologic, altered physiologic, and artifactual FDG uptake. Radiographics 2005;25:897-912.
11Fukui MB, Blodgett TM, Snyderman CH, Johnson JJ, Myers EN, Townsend DW, et al. Combined PET-CT in the head and neck: Part 2. Diagnostic uses and pitfalls of oncologic imaging. Radiographics 2005;25:913-30.
12Wong RJ, Lin DT, Schöder H, Patel SG, Gonen M, Wolden S, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of [(18) F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:4199-208.
13Gandhi D, Gujar S, Mukherji SK. Magnetic resonance imaging of perineural spread of head and neck malignancies. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:79-85.
14Platzek I, Beuthien-Baumann B, Schneider M, Gudziol V, Langner J, Schramm G, et al. PET/MRI in head and neck cancer: Initial experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013;40:6-11.
15Schaarschmidt BM, Heusch P, Buchbender C, Ruhlmann M, Bergmann C, Ruhlmann V, et al. Locoregional tumour evaluation of squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck area: A comparison between MRI, PET/CT and integrated PET/MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016;43:92-102.