Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine

CASE REPORT
Year
: 2013  |  Volume : 28  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 168--170

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in a case of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: An unusual presentation


Maria M D'souza1, Abhinav Jaimini1, Tapan Kumar Dhali2, Paschal Dísouza2, Sanjiv Saw1, Rajnish Sharma1, Anupam Mondal1,  
1 Department of PET Imaging, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Dermatology and Venereology, ESIPGIMSR, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Maria M DęSQĽsouza
Department of PET Imaging, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences, Brig. SK Majumdar Marg, New Delhi 110 054
India

Abstract

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are rare tumors, with an estimated incidence of 0.1/100,000/year. They are regarded as a rare variety of soft-tissue sarcomas that derive from peripheral nerves or from cells associated with the nerve sheath. Until 50% of observed MPNSTs occur in patients with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1). The typical presenting signs and symptoms of a PNST are a palpable mass involving a peripheral nerve, loss of nerve function and/or pain. Recently, positron emission tomography (PET) has been used to detect 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in these tumors. Most of the PET studies have been reported in patients with NF1. We report a case of sporadic MPNST masquerading as infectious dermatoses, with an unusual PET/computed tomography presentation.



How to cite this article:
D'souza MM, Jaimini A, Dhali TK, Dísouza P, Saw S, Sharma R, Mondal A. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in a case of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: An unusual presentation.Indian J Nucl Med 2013;28:168-170


How to cite this URL:
D'souza MM, Jaimini A, Dhali TK, Dísouza P, Saw S, Sharma R, Mondal A. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in a case of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: An unusual presentation. Indian J Nucl Med [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Nov 19 ];28:168-170
Available from: http://www.ijnm.in/text.asp?2013/28/3/168/119551


Full Text

 Introduction



Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are a rare variety of soft-tissue sarcoma of ectomesenchymal origin, [1] with an estimated incidence of 0.1/100,000/year. [2] Recently, fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been employed in differentiating the malignant from the benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors. The current case highlights an unusual PET/CT presentation of MPNST masquerading clinically as infected dermatoses.

 Case Report



A 64-year-old male, working as a gardener, presented with multiple rapidly progressive asymptomatic skin colored raised lesions 2-4 cm in diameter, over the medial border of the right foot and lower part of the right leg since 1 month. The lesion was subjected to punch biopsy, with clinical differential diagnosis of sporotrichosis, actinomycetoma, linear cutaneous leishmaniasis and atypical mycobacterial infection. Histopathology revealed a malignant mesenchymal tumor, which was confirmed to be a MPNST on immunohistochemistry. Soon thereafter, the lesions rapidly increased in size and number and began to ulcerate and become painful [Figure 1]a. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the right lower limb revealed multiple enhancing nodular lesions seen involving the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Subsequently, a whole body 18F-FDG PET/contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scan was performed on a whole body full ring PET/CT camera (Discovery STE 16, GE). 370 MBq of 18F-FDG was administered intravenously subsequent to a 6 h fast. Whole body CECT scan was performed after intravenous instillation of non-ionic contrast medium. After the CT scan, an emission scan was performed from head to thigh for 2 min per frame. Images were reconstructed by 3D VUE algorithm (GE) and viewed on a Xeleris workstation (GE) using the volumetric protocol. The study revealed multiple FDG avid nodular lesions (maximum standardized uptake value 18.6) in the right lower limb [Figure 1]b, which were many more in number compared with those picked up on cutaneous examination.{Figure 1}

MPNSTs arise from a peripheral nerve or its branches or from the nerve sheath. [3] Although they may arise spontaneously, up to 50% arise in patients of neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1). [4] Histopathological and immunohistochemical studies play an important role in the diagnosis of these tumors. MRI is the imaging modality of choice because it can reveal the nerve of origin and its relationship to adjacent structures. [5] Although it is well-known that these tumors can extend for considerable distances along nerves, it may not always be possible to delineate the origin from the nerve. A recent study by Bilgic et al. Has shown that the nerve origin could be identified only in 45-56% cases. [6] There have been recent reports of FDG PET/CT in MPNST, most of which have been performed in patients with NF1. It has been documented as a useful tool in monitoring clinically stable NF1 patients with plexiform neurofibromas as it could predict which were more likely to subsequently grow rapidly. [7] It has also been found that in patients with NF1 harboring MPNSTs; higher FDG uptake is associated with poorer survival rates. [8] It has proved efficacious in distinguishing benign from malignant nerve sheath tumors. In addition, it can assist in guiding targeted needle core biopsies and may provide critical information in tumors that are not amenable to biopsy. [9] It thus plays an important role in the staging, restaging and post-therapy follow-up of MPNST in NF1. [10] A high FDG uptake has been documented in sporadic MPNSTs also, as is well seen in the coronal maximum intensity projection image [Figure 2] in the present case.{Figure 2}

MPNSTs usually present as discrete masses, which may be multifocal, especially in cases of NF1. The present case was unusual in its presentation, owing to the linear arrangement of multiple nodules over the lower extremity in a gardener, raising the possibility of infectious dermatoses. These multiple hypermetabolic mildly enhancing nodular lesions were restricted to the skin and subcutaneous tissue with no extension into the underlying muscles [Figure 3]. The additional lesions detected on PET/CT were also proven to be MPNST based on histopathology with immunocytochemistry [Figure 4]. Radical surgical resection is the treatment of choice in MPNST. [11] They are generally considered chemotherapy and radiotherapy resistant tumors. Though multimodality therapy, including surgical resection and adjuvant radiotherapy, is available, the prognosis remains dismal.{Figure 3}{Figure 4}

References

1Hruban RH, Shiu MH, Senie RT, Woodruff JM. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors of the buttock and lower extremity. A study of 43 cases. Cancer 1990;66:1253-65.
2Enzinger FM, Weiss SW. Malignant tumours of peripheral nerves. In: Enzinger FM, Weiss SW, editors. Soft Tissue Tumors, Vol. 31. St. Louis: CV Mosby Company; 2001. p. 1209-63.
3Hirose T, Scheithauer BW, Sano T. Perineurial malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST): A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study of seven cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1998;22:1368-78.
4Anghileri M, Miceli R, Fiore M, Mariani L, Ferrari A, Mussi C, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: Prognostic factors and survival in a series of patients treated at a single institution. Cancer 2006;107:1065-74.
5Suh JS, Abenoza P, Galloway HR, Everson LI, Griffiths HJ. Peripheral (extracranial) nerve tumors: Correlation of MR imaging and histologic findings. Radiology 1992;183:341-6.
6Bilgic B, Ates LE, Demiryont M, Ozger H, Dizdar Y. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors associated with neurofibromatosis type 1. Pathol Oncol Res 2003;9:201-5.
7Fisher MJ, Basu S, Dombi E, Yu JQ, Widemann BC, Pollock AN, et al. The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in predicting plexiform neurofibroma progression. J Neurooncol 2008;87:165-71.
8Brenner W, Friedrich RE, Gawad KA, Hagel C, von Deimling A, de Wit M, et al. Prognostic relevance of FDG PET in patients with neurofibromatosis type-1 and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:428-32.
9Benz MR, Czernin J, Dry SM, Tap WD, Allen-Auerbach MS, Elashoff D, et al. Quantitative F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography accurately characterizes peripheral nerve sheath tumors as malignant or benign. Cancer 2010;116:451-8.
10Chander S, Westphal SM, Zak IT, Bloom DA, Zingas AP, Joyrich RN, et al. Retroperitoneal malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: Evaluation with serial FDG-PET. Clin Nucl Med 2004;29:415-8.
11Ramanathan RC, Thomas JM. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours associated with von Recklinghausen's neurofibromatosis. Eur J Surg Oncol 1999;25:190-3.