Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Home | About IJNM | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions | Ahead of Print | Online submissionLogin 
Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 429 Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
 Table of Contents     
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 32  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 384  

Reply by the author


Date of Web Publication12-Oct-2017

Correspondence Address:
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-3919.216574

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
. Reply by the author. Indian J Nucl Med 2017;32:384

How to cite this URL:
. Reply by the author. Indian J Nucl Med [serial online] 2017 [cited 2018 Oct 22];32:384. Available from: http://www.ijnm.in/text.asp?2017/32/4/384/216574



Dear Sir,

Thank you very much for your interest in our paper. The reply to your queries is as under:

  1. Did the authors use any other adjuncts in surgery like surgical loupe and frozen section biopsy?


  2. Reply: The use of loupes was at the surgeon's discretion. Frozen section was carried out to confirm the nature of tissue.

  3. What was the mean size of their adenoma?


  4. Reply: 2 cm × 1.3 cm × 1 cm.

  5. What was the mean duration of surgery in which they did not use radio guided surgery and did it make significant difference?


  6. Reply: We have not documented the duration of surgery in cases where we have not used gamma probe. Approximate duration would have been Reply by the Authoraround 1 h. As discussed in our article, one of the advantages in using gamma probe is to assure the surgeon of the completeness of the resection, without the requirement of intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH).

  7. Did they retract or divide the strap muscles?


  8. Reply: The strap muscles were not divided in any of the procedures. They were retractedmedially for exposure.

  9. What was the timing of PTH postoperatively?


  10. Reply: Postoperatively PTH was repeated at 1 h and 24 h.

  11. In how much percentage of patients, the phenomenon of delayed calcium fall was exhibited?


Reply: We had no patient who had delayed calcium fall. As mentioned the mean 24 h postoperative calcium was 8.27 ± 0.73 mg/dl.






 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed163    
    Printed3    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded41    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal