|Year : 2012 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 141-144
The role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computerized tomography in resolving therapeutic dilemmas in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma
Rachna Seth1, Kriti Puri1, Prashant Singh1, Panneer Selvam1, Rakesh Kumar2
1 Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
|Date of Web Publication||31-May-2013|
Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Introduction: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable lymphoma with cure rates of over 80% and even higher with limited stage disease. Computerized tomography (CT) scan is currently the recommended modality in staging and assessment of response to therapy in patients with HL. However, CT has its limitations. This study describes our experience with patients of HL where fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)-CT scan helped decide further management, after completion of chemotherapy. Methodology: This is a retrospective review of the records of children diagnosed with HL at our center. Patients with post-treatment CT scan showing evidence of residual disease, who underwent FDG-PET-CT for deciding further management, were included in the study. Results: Thirty one patients were diagnosed with HL during this period. Nine patients were eligible and underwent PET-CT. In 8 out of 9 patients, PET-CT showed no scan evidence of active disease. In one patient, FDG-PET-CT carried out after completion of chemotherapy showed evidence of active disease and was given radiotherapy. Conclusion: FDG-PET-CT is a promising modality in deciding further management when there is discordance between the post-treatment CT scan and clinical condition of the patient with HL thus avoiding unnecessary chemotherapy/radiotherapy.
Keywords: Children, hodgkin lymphoma, positron emission tomography - computerized tomography
|How to cite this article:|
Seth R, Puri K, Singh P, Selvam P, Kumar R. The role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computerized tomography in resolving therapeutic dilemmas in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma. Indian J Nucl Med 2012;27:141-4
|How to cite this URL:|
Seth R, Puri K, Singh P, Selvam P, Kumar R. The role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computerized tomography in resolving therapeutic dilemmas in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma. Indian J Nucl Med [serial online] 2012 [cited 2020 May 28];27:141-4. Available from: http://www.ijnm.in/text.asp?2012/27/3/141/112717
| Introduction|| |
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable lymphoma with overall cure rates exceeding 80% and over 90% with limited stage disease.  The improved survival has led to the concern about long-term effects of cancer therapy adversely affecting the quality of life of these children. ,, Computerized tomography (CT) scan is currently the recommended modality in the staging and assessment of response at the end of therapy in patients with HL.  The drawbacks of CT scan include its failure to differentiate areas of necrosis and fibrosis in residual masses from viable tumor thus, creating a therapeutic dilemma whether the patient requires further treatment or not.  It also fails to identify tumor deposits in unenlarged nodes thus, underestimating the stage of the disease before starting therapy.
Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has been widely established in the treatment protocol of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). ,,, In recent times it is being used with in HL, for staging at the time of diagnosis, to differentiate persistent, active disease from residual, but inactive masses at the completion of therapy as well as for monitoring for relapse. ,,,,, However, PET alone has lower specificity because of poor localization details. Introduction of combined PET and CT (18F-FDG-PET/CT) technology has revolutionized imaging by fusing functional and anatomical data. It is being routinely used for staging, response monitoring and prognostication of a wide array of tumors. This study describes our experience with nine patients of HL where FDG-PET-CT scan helped us to decide further management after completion of planned chemotherapy.
| Methods|| |
This is a retrospective review of the records of all children aged less than 12 years, diagnosed with HL on biopsy enrolled in pediatric oncology clinic at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences between October 2005 and May 2010. Patients with post-treatment CT scan showing evidence of residual disease, who underwent FDG-PET-CT for deciding further management, were included for the study. Those with concurrent HIV infection, any pre-existing severe organ (kidney, liver, cardiac, and cerebral) dysfunction were excluded.
The pre-treatment evaluation included a detailed history and physical examination. A baseline hemogram and serum biochemistry including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was obtained. A chest X-ray and contrast enhanced computerized tomographic scan (CECT) of chest, abdomen and pelvis were carried out in all patients. A biopsy was carried out from the most appropriate site. A bone marrow aspiration/biopsy was carried out in all except in stage IA-IIA patients. A technetium-99 bone scan was carried out if indicated. Clinical staging was carried out according to the Ann-Arbor classification.  Splenic involvement was defined as clinically detectable splenomegaly or presence of hypodense lesions on abdominal CECT in patients without clinically detected splenomegaly bulky disease was defined as presence of lymph nodal mass of at least 6 cm diameter or a mediastinal mass with a diameter exceeding one-third of the maximum intra-thoracic cavity width on an upright postero-anterior chest radiograph. Patients were histologically classified according to the Ryes modification of Lukes and Butler scheme. 
Patients treated at our center received either 4 alternate cycles of adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine/cyclophosphamide, oncovin, procarbazine, prednisone (ABVD/COPP) or 4-6 cycles of ABVD as initial therapy. Patients were reassessed for residual disease and need for radiotherapy/escalated chemotherapy at end of chemotherapy with CT scan of the site of disease. FDG-PET scan was carried out whenever there was a discordance of clinical evaluation and CT findings.
After fasting for at least 4 h and with patients in a resting state, in a quiet room, a dose of 5.3 MBq/kg (0.14 mCi/kg) of FDG was injected intravenously. Older children were instructed to lie still whereas smaller children were encouraged to sleep. Sedation was carried out when needed using 0.1 mg/kg midazolam to avoid motion artifacts. PET-CT scan was acquired on a dedicated PET-CT scanner approximately 60 min after intravenous injection of radiotracer on a Biograph scanner (Siemens, Germany). After the acquisition, data was transferred to a workstation for processing and interpretation. After reconstruction of the images were displayed in axial, sagittal and coronal planes. The image interpretation and analysis was performed qualitatively (visually).
| Results|| |
Thirty one patients were diagnosed with HL at our center during the study period. Nine of these patients underwent PET scans at the end of treatment and were found to be eligible. The patient profiles are summarized in [Table 1].
In all nine patients, CT scan evaluation after completion of chemotherapy revealed residual disease. As there was discrepancy between clinical and radiological findings, the patients underwent a FDG-PET scan. The findings are described in [Table 2].
|Table 2: Computerized tomography and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computerized tomography findings|
Click here to view
In 8 out of 9 patients, FDG-PET showed no scan evidence of active disease. No further treatment was given to these patients. In one patient, FDG-PET carried out after completion of chemotherapy showed evidence of active disease in spleen and retroperitoneal lymphnodes. This patient was given escalated chemotherapy for HL. Follow-up FDG-PET performed. After completion the chemotherapy, showed no scan evidence of active disease. The patient continues to be in remission at a follow-up of 20 months.
| Discussion|| |
Recent changes in the treatment protocols for over the past two decades have resulted in improved survival among patients of HL. , CT scan is the recommended imaging modality at the end of therapy and often detects residual disease based on persistence of sizeable lymphadenopathy/organ enlargement/hypoechoic lesions in patients who are clinically well.  Treating all these residual masses with chemotherapy or radiotherapy may result in unwanted morbidity. There is thus, a need for an imaging modality to differentiate residual but inactive/inert masses from active lesions that require further treatment. The use of PET in detection of cancer cells employing FDG as the tracer molecule is based on Warburg's demonstration that malignant cells show accelerated glucose metabolism.  As early as 7 days after first administration of chemotherapy and in most patients after 2 cycles of chemotherapy, there is shutdown of cellular metabolic and chemokine-synthetic machinery.  However, tumor shrinkage takes a longer. In contrast, in patients not responding to chemotherapy, the cellular metabolic activity persists and is evidenced by increased uptake.  This sensitivity of PET holds promise for extensive use in both response assessments during chemotherapy, as well as in cases with discordant clinical and CT findings after therapy completion.
PET scan has widespread use among NHL patients in staging, post-therapy assessments and evaluation of residual masses. ,,, Teresawa, et al. in a systemic review found varying sensitivities from 0.33 to 0.77 and specificity from 0.82 to 1.00 in post-therapy evaluation of NHL patients.  It is a recommended modality in the response assessment of NHL.  As in NHL, PET has been evaluated in the context of staging, response assessment and end-therapy assessment in HL but pediatric data is scarce. Though, PET scan detects smaller lymph node involvement and elucidates bone marrow, splenic and liver involvement, it is not the standard in HL staging due to high sensitivity and false positivity rates. 
The main utility of FDG-PET in HL is post-treatment assessment. But studies in this regard have produced conflicting results. Terasawa, et al. in a systemic review reported sensitivity between 0.50 and 1.00 and specificity between 0.67 and 1.00 for post-treatment evaluations.  Juweid reported a consistently high negative predictive value averaging about 90% and exceeding 80%, which is similar to that of CT.  The positive predictive value while being more variable (averaging approximately 65% with most studies reporting values exceeding 50%), was higher than that of CT (about 20%). ,,,, However, these data primarily reflects that of adult patients of HL. Pediatric data is scarce and inconclusive. ,,
FDG-PET has also been studied as a predictor of outcome in HL. A negative interim PET after 2 cycles of chemotherapy was associated with an increased 2 year progression free survival rate compared to the PET positive group. ,, Furth et al. in a prospective study demonstrated that pediatric HL patients with a negative PET during early response assessment (after 2 cycles of chemotherapy) have an excellent prognosis while PET-positive patients have an increased risk for relapse. They also demonstrated that a standardized uptake value (SUV) max reduction of < 58% was associated with an increase in risk of relapse. 
The present studied demonstrated the role of PET-CT in resolving therapeutic dilemmas in 29% of patients which are common after therapy for HL. The limitations of the present study are small sample size and retrospective nature.
Though, doing a PET-CT in all such patients involves lot of cost, the cost of further chemo/radiotherapy and its side-effects outweigh the monetary burden. However, this modality of investigation has the potential as a baseline evaluation to detect small areas of disease involvement not detected by CT and as a prognostic marker for predicting disease free interval.
| Conclusion|| |
PET-CT scan is a promising modality in deciding further management when faced with situations where there is discordance between the post-treatment CT scan and the clinicalcondition of patient with Hodgkin lymphoma, thus, avoiding unnecessary chemotherapy/radiotherapy.
| References|| |
|1.||Lee AI, Zuckerman DS, van den Abbeele AD, Aquino SL, Crowley D, Toomey C, et al. Surveillance imaging of Hodgkin lymphoma patients in first remission: A clinical and economic analysis. Cancer 2010;116:3835-42. |
|2.||Evens AM, Hutchings M, Diehl V. Treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma: The past, present, and future. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2008;5:543-56. |
|3.||Lavoie JC, Connors JM, Phillips GL, Reece DE, Barnett MJ, Forrest DL, et al. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for primary refractory or relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma: Long-term outcome in the first 100 patients treated in Vancouver. Blood 2005;106:1473-8. |
|4.||Fermé C, Eghbali H, Meerwaldt JH, Rieux C, Bosq J, Berger F, et al. Chemotherapy plus involved-field radiation in early-stage Hodgkin′s disease. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1916-27. |
|5.||National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Hodgkin lymphoma.Version 1.2013. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/hodgkins.pdf (last accessed March 19 2013) |
|6.||Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, Gascoyne RD, Specht L, Horning SJ, et al. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:579-86. |
|7.||Ansell SM, Armitage JO. Positron emission tomographic scans in lymphoma: Convention and controversy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87:571-80. |
|8.||Terasawa T, Nihashi T, Hotta T, Nagai H. 18F-FDG PET for posttherapy assessment of Hodgkin′s disease and aggressive Non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma: A systematic review. J Nucl Med 2008;49:13-21. |
|9.||Seam P, Juweid ME, Cheson BD. The role of FDG-PET scans in patients with lymphoma. Blood 2007;110:3507-16. |
|10.||Gallamini A. Positron emission tomography scanning: A new paradigm for the management of Hodgkin′s lymphoma. Haematologica 2010;95:1046-8. |
|11.||Juweid ME. Utility of positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in managing patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2006;259-65. |
|12.||de Wit M, Bohuslavizki KH, Buchert R, Bumann D, Clausen M, Hossfeld DK. 18FDG-PET following treatment as valid predictor for disease-free survival in Hodgkin′s lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2001;12:29-37. |
|13.||Flavell KJ, Murray PG. Hodgkin′s disease and the Epstein-Barr virus. Mol Pathol. 2000;53:262-9. |
|14.||Dittmann H, Sokler M, Kollmannsberger C, Dohmen BM, Baumann C, Kopp A, et al. Comparison of 18FDG-PET with CT scans in the evaluation of patients with residual and recurrent Hodgkin′s lymphoma. Oncol Rep 2001;8:1393-9. |
|15.||Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Thomas J, Vandenberghe P, Balzarini J, et al. Can positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose after first-line treatment distinguish Hodgkin′s disease patients who need additional therapy from others in whom additional therapy would mean avoidable toxicity? Br J Haematol 2001;115:272-8. |
|16.||Hueltenschmidt B, Sautter-Bihl ML, Lang O, Maul FD, Fischer J, Mergenthaler HG, et al. Whole body positron emission tomography in the treatment of Hodgkin disease. Cancer 2001;91:302-10. |
|17.||Zijlstra JM, Lindauer-van der Werf G, Hoekstra OS, Hooft L, Riphagen II, Huijgens PC. 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for post-treatment evaluation of malignant lymphoma: A systematic review. Haematologica 2006;91:522-9. |
|18.||Meany HJ, Gidvani VK, Minniti CP. Utility of PET scans to predict disease relapse in pediatric patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;48:399-402. |
|19.||Furth C, Steffen IG, Amthauer H, Ruf J, Misch D, Schönberger S, et al. Early and late therapy response assessment with 18F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in pediatric Hodgkin′s lymphoma: Analysis of a prospective multicenter trial. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4385-91. |
|20.||Levine JM, Weiner M, Kelly KM. Routine use of PET scans after completion of therapy in pediatric Hodgkin disease results in a high false positive rate. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2006;28:711-4. |
|21.||Hutchings M, Loft A, Hansen M, Pedersen LM, Buhl T, Jurlander J, et al. FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2006;107:52-9. |
|22.||Gallamini A, Rigacci L, Merli F, Nassi L, Bosi A, Capodanno I, et al. The predictive value of positron emission tomography scanning performed after two courses of standard therapy on treatment outcome in advanced stage Hodgkin′s disease. Haematologica 2006;91:475-81. |
|23.||Zinzani PL, Tani M, Fanti S, Alinari L, Musuraca G, Marchi E, et al. Early positron emission tomography (PET) restaging: A predictive final response in Hodgkin′s disease patients. Ann Oncol 2006;17:1296-300. |
[Table 1], [Table 2]