Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Home | About IJNM | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions | Ahead of Print | Online submissionLogin 
Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 940 Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2007  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 54-59

FDG PET/CT imaging in the detection of primary tumors in carcinoma of unknown primary sites


Army Hospital (R&R), Delhi Cantt, India

Correspondence Address:
S S Anand
Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, Army Hospital (R&R), Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, 110010
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Background: Carcinoma of unknown primary sites (CUP) is defined as the presence of histologically proven metastatic disease without evidence of a primary tumor. Purpose: The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the utility of integrated Positron Emission Tomography/Computed tomography (PET/CT) with 18 F-Fluro-deoxyglucose (FDG) in depicting the primary lesion in CUP as compared with PET & Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT). Methods: 45 patients (34 males, age range 27-75 years and 11 females, age range 46-77 years) diagnosed with CUP were subjected to FDG PET/CT with the aim of locating the site of primary tumor. All patients underwent a conventional diagnostic work up that included CECT scan of the relevant parts of the body. The PET/CT images were evaluated separately as only PET images & fused PET/CT images. All potential sites of primary tumor detected by the CECT, PET & PET/CT imaging were subsequently sampled & verified by histopathologic examination as true positive or false positive. Data was compiled and the detection rate and positive predictive value for the detection of the primary tumors were calculated for CECT, PET & PET/CT. The incremental value of PET/CT over CECT and PET alone for the detection of primary tumor was assessed. Results: CECT detected a possible site of primary tumor in 10 out of 45 cases, of which 9 were true positive. PET/CT depicted the primary tumor in 16 of 45 patients. Of these 14 were true positive and two were false positive. PET alone detected a suspected primary tumor site in 22 of the 45 patients out of which 08 were false positive. In 31 patients (68.9%), the primary tumor site remained occult. PET/CT detected the primary in 55.6% more cases than CECT alone (14 vs 9). The detection rate for CECT, PET and PET/CT were 20%, 31.1% and 31.1% respectively. The positive predictive value of CT, PET & PET/CT were 90%, 63.6% & 87.5% respectively. Conclusion: Integrated PET/CT has higher detection rate for primary tumor in cases of CUP than CECT. Addition of CT information to PET images of PET/CT increases the diagnostic accuracy. Thus integrated PET/CT appears to be a better tool in detecting the site of primary in cases of CUP, than CECT or PET alone.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed518    
    Printed73    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded138    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal